Very
soon the whole social care consultation merry-go-round will start once again with the
emergence of the White Paper. When the Government publish this undoubtedly the focus, once more, will be on
who pays for care services
and how they do so, leaving out HOW MUCH such services really cost.
Part of the debate on
social care is about providing quality services but there is little discussion
how this is achieved and how the front line care workforce is trained to
deliver that quality and why training is so important to achieving the best possible
outcomes for those who rely on care services.
Everyone
sitting in an office right now knows about Health & Safety at Work, to most
it is something that is fairly abstract but rigorously enforced by the ‘Health
& Safety Police’ in a manner that appears somewhat obsessive. Yet in social
care health and safety is a lot more immediate and is not only about the
workers but also about the people they support and care for. Slips, trips and
falls, for example, become a much greater hazard for those who are frail and
have problems with mobility, it is not just a case of worrying where computer
terminal wires trail but all small lumps and bumps in the flooring become
potentially hazardous.
Care
workers, therefore, have to have a greater awareness of health and safety than the average worker
and, of course that level of training costs.
One
of the favourite things in social
care is to compare the workforce (in terms of pay conditions etc) with the retail sector. I have
often questioned this comparison but the issue of training helps illustrate why
the comparison is a false one, particularly moving and handling. Obviously both
jobs involve manual handling, lifting etc but in a supermarket the only handling
involves inanimate objects. How much more complex the need to be able to handle
people, to help them in and out of bed or the bath, how to use the more complex
equipment, such as hoists, which need to be tailored to the individual.
Care
workers, therefore, have to have a greater awareness of moving and handling than the average
worker and, of course that level of training costs.
The
same applies to many of the basic training elements in many workplaces where
care workers have the additional element of having to take into account how
that knowledge applies to those they work with.
Beyond
that the care workforce is expected to have additional knowledge that is,
generally, only otherwise found in the health sector. This includes infection
control and ensuring that the risk of infection is minimised, they need to
understand the concepts of cross contamination, the hazards of handling bodily
waste and how to deal with contamination if it occurs. Care workers need
awareness of medication, how to store it, deliver it and record its use and
care workers need to understand the signs and symptoms of adult abuse and what
to do if they suspect abuse has taken place.
Society
also expects care workers to deliver dignity and respect to those they provide
services for. While the words dignity and respect are often bandied about very
little is said about what this involves and the principle skill is
communication and care workers need to be trained in the complexities of
communication in order to listen to and understand the needs of the individual
to deliver the best possible service.
Social
care is often portrayed as a generic service where care workers are
transferable. But, in fact, care services are far from generic, older peoples
services are vastly different from learning disability services or mental
health service or physical disability services and aside from the general
skills listed above there are also specialist skills needed by the care worker
dependent on the service they are working in. Knowledge of dementia is an
essential skill for working with older people but not in many other services, (although
in learning disability services dementia is an issue that is probably needs
more consideration as the population ages), knowledge of autism and epilepsy is
needed in learning disability services where these conditions are prevalent
and, of course, knowledge about specific learning disabilities need to be known
in order to provide the best possible service.
Overall
then the care workforce needs extensive skills and knowledge to deliver the
best quality care. This sometimes fails, as demonstrated by Winterbourne View
and Ash Court but this cannot be surprising in a society that undervalues care
workers and fails to see the importance in ensuring care services are funded
sufficiently to allow the full spectrum of specialist training
to match the specialist service that care workers are expected to
deliver.
When
the White Paper is published and the consultation process around the
proposed draft social care bill starts they needs to be a greater examination of
what we expect the social care workforce to deliver, the skills and knowledge
that are needed to deliver quality care and how much investment is needed to
ensure these skills are in place.
No comments:
Post a Comment