Showing posts with label Politics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Politics. Show all posts

Friday, 4 May 2012

Politics, Passion & Social Care


In the classic sociological text “The Profession and Vocation of Politics” Max Weber states that ‘three qualities are pre-eminently decisive for a politician: passion, a sense of responsibility, judgement’. Passion, Weber argues, is not the romanticism of the intellectually interesting lacking all objective as ‘simply to feel passion, however genuinely, is not sufficient to make a politician unless in the form of a service to a cause. There has to be responsibility to that cause and judgement maintaining inner composure whilst being open to realities.

Weber warns, however, that ‘the politician has to overcome a quite trivial, all too human enemy which threatens him from within: common vanity, the mortal enemy of all dedication to a cause’.

Yesterday’s elections had another low turnout and the debate on voter apathy roles on with debates on ways to improve turnout but if we take Weber’s view the voter apathy can be explained by the lack of passion and responsibility of a cause to inspire voters in to the voting booth.

Over recent years Party Politics seems to have become just that, politics focused on which party can win, can they get enough seats to maintain a majority and what action can they take to maintain power. This is the common vanity that has best our politics, the passion for party success rather than passion and responsibility for a cause that will inspire the electorate.

What our politicians, at all levels, need to do is find the cause that impacts on their voting base and fight with passion for that cause and, if elected take responsibility for that cause. Those who simply get elected, then either settle into the party compliant role or who tilt at windmills on subjects that have little or no effect for the people who voted them into power will simply generate more and more apathy as voters fail to understand the point in electing anybody.

There can be many causes to promote but the ultimate goal has to be a cause that acts for the betterment of the people and, surely, there can be no greater cause than the one that seeks to help the most vulnerable in society to maintain their place in that society with dignity and respect.

Social care is a cause that has largely gone unsung by politicians, primarily because it is not a traditional policy area, and its increasing importance to society is grossly under-estimated as the population ages and we see an increase in age related conditions which will need greater numbers to provide services.

After years of prevarication and tinkering around the edges social care is crying out for a political champion to fight for the cause affecting so many people, social care is crying out for politicians to take responsibility for the care and support of the vulnerable in society and social care is crying out for passion in raising awareness of the needs of those who use care services.

The politician that can show genuine passion for helping the most vulnerable, who can take responsibility for ensuring the social care system is the best it can possibly be and show that the passion is directed at the people who need support rather than just a reason to be elected is the politician who can attract voters to the polling booths and the type of politician this country needs a lot more of right now.

Thursday, 19 April 2012

Why Prof Robert Winston Saddened Me


A few people may have noticed that I had an issue with Professor Robert Winston’s Party Political Broadcast on Wednesday night on behalf of the Labour Party.

As the restrictive limit of Twitter means it is difficult to fully express issues I thought I would take the opportunity to set out why I think the broadcast was misleading and why Professor Winston’s role was ingenuous.

The main thrust of the broadcast was the broken promises on the NHS by David Cameron and the Coalition, the ‘top-down’ reform imposed on the NHS by the Health and Social Care Act, the loss of nursing jobs and the cuts in NHS services in general. I have no disagreement with any of this and it is the normal cut and thrust of politics.

What I did disagree with was the implication that voting Labour in the forthcoming Local elections would help improve the NHS.

The fact is Local Councils have no executive power when it comes to the NHS, Councils cannot reverse cuts, Councils cannot employ more nurses in the NHS and Councils do not have the power to initiate any reforms of the NHS.

If you read the Health and Social Care Act (which I have) there is a significant increase in local council involvement in Health, particularly in terms of public health, integrated services (e.g. social care) and through Health & Well Being boards, but none of this gives local councils power over the NHS.

Now if Ed Milliband had been touting that voting Labour in May the NHS would be improved in the areas where Labour held the council I probably would not have batted an eyelid. I (and I expect many people) expect politicians to try and mislead me in order to  seduce me  to vote for them.

However when a well-respected, well-known figure of authority does this, it should be of major concern. I spoke to someone today who saw the broadcast and asked them what it meant, and they told me that if Labour won the council elections they would make changes to improve the NHS. When I pointed out that, actually, that would not happen I was told I was wrong because Robert Winston had said it.

It is somewhat ironic that the Party Political Broadcast that complained about the broken promises by one politician was actually implying promises that it could not keep!

Political spin will always exist but I am saddened when figures of authority indulge in it as it will, inevitably, diminish that authority.